[HPGMG Forum] HPGMG release v0.1
Vitali A. Morozov
morozov at anl.gov
Mon Jun 9 15:51:47 UTC 2014
I am looking at the result page
and see that you provide STREAM-based memory bandwidth for some
architectures. I suggest to specify a particular benchmark, let us say
"triad", because the result of STREAM is benchmark-dependent.
For BG/Q, I have measured 29.3 GB/s/node on "triad". For Cray XC30, I
have measured 48.6 GB/s/socket or 97.1 GB/s/node. This is slightly
better than the numbers you have reported.
For Cray XC30, the flop rate is 518.4 GF per node. For Xeon E5-2697 v2 @
2.7 GHz, each core can have 8 Flops/cycle - 4 way FMA - or 8 * 2.7 =
21.6 GFlops per core. 12 cores result in 259.2 GFlops per socket, 2
sockets give 518.4 GFlops.
On 06/07/2014 04:27 PM, Jed Brown wrote:
> Mark Adams <mfadams at lbl.gov> writes:
>> We are please to announce that hpgmg.org and the associated mailing
>> list hpgmg-forum at hpgmg.org is officially available.
> Thanks, Mark. To help kick off the discussion, I would like to call
> attention to our recent blog posts describing "results".
> The most recent announces the v0.1 release and includes a Kiviat diagram
> comparing the on-node performance characteristics of CORAL apps and
> several benchmarks running on Blue Gene/Q.
> This earlier post shows performance on a variety of top machines:
> We are interested in better ways to collect and present the comparison
> data as well as any characteristics that you think are important.
> In addition to the general principles on the front page, some further
> rationale is given at:
> None of this is set in stone and we would be happy to discuss any
> questions or comments on this list.
> Please encourage any interested colleagues to subscribe to this list:
> HPGMG-Forum mailing list
> HPGMG-Forum at hpgmg.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the HPGMG-Forum