[HPGMG Forum] HPGMG release v0.1

Jeff Hammond jeff.science at gmail.com
Sat Jun 7 22:31:25 UTC 2014

On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 3:26 PM, Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
>    The use of multicore processor == sockets as the independent variable in the plot of aggregate performance seems arbitrary. Though people should not use this kind of plot to compare machines they will. Now just change sockets to nodes and boom suddenly the machines compare very differently (since some systems have two sockets per node and some one). Should cores be used instead? Or hardware threads? Or cores scaled by their clock speed? Or hardware floating point units (scaled by clock speed?) ? Or number of instruction decorders? Power usage? Cost? etc etc. Maybe have a dynamic plot where one can switch the independent variable by selecting from a menu or moving the mouse over choices ….?

The last suggestion is obviously the best one since it is the most
general, but I think power is the best choice of independent variable.
Most of the other hardware features are bad choices because it is very
hard to determine some of these.  What is the clock speed of an Intel
socket that does dynamic frequency scaling?  How do you count cores on
a GPU?  NVIDIA's core-counting methodology is complete nonsense...



> On Jun 7, 2014, at 4:27 PM, Jed Brown <jed at jedbrown.org> wrote:
>> Mark Adams <mfadams at lbl.gov> writes:
>>> We are please to announce that hpgmg.org and the associated mailing
>>> list hpgmg-forum at hpgmg.org is officially available.
>> Thanks, Mark.  To help kick off the discussion, I would like to call
>> attention to our recent blog posts describing "results".
>> The most recent announces the v0.1 release and includes a Kiviat diagram
>> comparing the on-node performance characteristics of CORAL apps and
>> several benchmarks running on Blue Gene/Q.
>>  https://hpgmg.org/2014/06/06/hpgmg-01/
>> This earlier post shows performance on a variety of top machines:
>>  https://hpgmg.org/2014/05/15/fv-results/
>> We are interested in better ways to collect and present the comparison
>> data as well as any characteristics that you think are important.
>> In addition to the general principles on the front page, some further
>> rationale is given at:
>>  https://hpgmg.org/why/
>> None of this is set in stone and we would be happy to discuss any
>> questions or comments on this list.
>> Please encourage any interested colleagues to subscribe to this list:
>>  https://hpgmg.org/lists/listinfo/hpgmg-forum
>> _______________________________________________
>> HPGMG-Forum mailing list
>> HPGMG-Forum at hpgmg.org
>> https://hpgmg.org/lists/listinfo/hpgmg-forum
> _______________________________________________
> HPGMG-Forum mailing list
> HPGMG-Forum at hpgmg.org
> https://hpgmg.org/lists/listinfo/hpgmg-forum

Jeff Hammond
jeff.science at gmail.com

More information about the HPGMG-Forum mailing list